Why do you think the author wrote this work?

The reason that I think that he wrote the book is that he wanted to tell the people what is really going on in our government today and military. On the front cover of the book it says the book the CIA does not want you to read so you know he wrote this to inform people on what is really going on in the middle east that is the reason that he wrote this book. It is also partially because he want to entertain as well by telling us story's of his time in the CIA. 

Explain what you plan to read next and why (Be specific).

 I have not quite finished jaw breaker yet but i plan to read the book lone survior next if i get to it. The reason i will try and read this book next is that the two books both have many thing in common they are both non-fiction war books and have gotten good reviews from people that have read the book. If i can not get ahold of that book than i will try to read black hawk down. Black hawk down is just like the books that i have already mentioned non-fition war books. The book is about how what happened on that day when a black hawk helicopter was shot down.

Make a text-to-text, text-to-self, and text-to-world connection to the book

A book that i can connect this to that i have read is lone survivor and i find these books to be similar in many ways. one way that they are similar is that they are both military themed most of the books that i read are military themed also they are both non-fiction. Most of the books are also non-fiction i Prefere to read non-fiction because it is cool to here about there storys and know that this really happened in real life unlike the hunger games. Books like these only have two options for a plot either something went horibbley wrong or they did something amazing that will be marked down in history. But jaw breaker is not really any of those though in the book is just about tracking bin laden but you do not need to read the book to know that he did not kill him because this book came out in like 99 and bin laden was killed in 2011 roughly.

A way i can can connect this book to the world is that since this is a nonfiction book this entire thing is a text to world connection. In this book they are talking about real problems in socity not our society but mostly one s in the middle est but you probualy could of guest that. In this book they are tracking down bin laden and the Al-queda those are real problem in our world or well use to be before we killed bin laden but the Al-queda is still a threat in our socity.

Reflection

1.  A specific word that describes my writers voice is chatty. I think this way because in my post I through alot of imformation and my opinion out there in a imformal way. But the way that i do it still gets the point across a example from my sixth post shows that "That is what makes the vocabulary in this book difficult you have to study these terms to know what they mean unless you are screwed that is what my dad basically told me." As you can tell that is highly imformal but still gets the point across easily and affectively.This shows my personality as a writer because when I always have to do a writing assignment I break it down into a imformal/simplier way that shows how the question is alot easier than the way it is portrayed using bigger word. I also like to make it feel friendly when I write i do this because if it is friendlier writing style it is easier to read the piece because i do not want to bore the writer.

2. A example of diction that i use is imformal diction. I know this because i write the same way i would talk in person in a imformal way and the definition of imformal diction is  "speaks naturally or in one's real life manner." a example that shows how i do write the same way i would talk in person is actually the same quote from paragraph 1 "That is what makes the vocabulary in this book difficult you have to study these terms to know what they mean unless you are screwed that is what my dad basically told me." if you have met me before you would that is how i talk in a friendly imformal way. A type of syntax i would use is sentence length in my post i use a longer sentence format. in longer sentence format you use rougly more than 13 words and that what i do it shows that i like to get my oppinion across and voice my oppinion more instead of writing shorter sentences. A example that shows me useing longer sentences is " The book has so many of them that in the beginning of the book it has its own dictionary that is several pages long and in some of the terms." this show that i use longer sentences because i want to voice my oppinion more if i was using shoter sentences.






    

Write a post about vocabulary you observe in the context of your book.

The vocabulary in my book that I am reading is pretty big but it is mostly stuff I do not know like military terms. The book has so many of them that in the beginning of the book it has its own dictionary that is several pages long and in some of the terms. They have terms like CENTCOM, ISID, SOFLAM and SIGNIT. That is what makes the vocabulary in this book difficult u have to study these terms to know what they mean unless you are screwed that is what my dad basically told me. Before you read this book you have to study that little section pretty well before hand I tried just going right into the book and I only got a few pages in until I actually had to go back and study it. An example from the book that shows how they use the vocabulary is " we have to be married to CENTCOM,"  

column

The coum that i read was about the olympic hockey team the 1980 team. This team was not exspected to do very well in the oplympics but beat the odds to claim gold in the oplypics by beating the soviets. The title of this is we knew it would last forever. This is refering to how even today we still remember that team that beat the soviets even though in the next olympics we got beat and even today we can not beat russia we just had one reallly good team i would not call it a fluke but thats probualy what the russians think if u asked them about the 1980 olympics. As some of you probualy know this was made into a movie which was a pretty good movie about there struggle to beat the soviets.

The best thing about my book is… (could also be flipped to “The worst thing about my book is…”)

 The best thing about my book is that it is about the military and that it is non-fiction. The reason that I like that is about the military is that I have always have been interested in the military so when I read stuff like this it makes me think that this could be me one day because I hope to go into the military when I am older and work operations like the one you see on the military channel or read in books. I like the book because it is non-fiction because it kind of plays into what I said before about thinking that stuff like this happens in real life and I could be apart of something that great and big.

What I dislike about the book is the secretive ness of not being able to fully understand what is going on. A example of this is "For the next hour I briefed Dobbins on everything starting with the -------------." as you can see that would get quite irritating to see that over and over again sometimes I have to go back and reread the section to fully grip what is going on during this certain section. I also do not like is that it is taking a while to get to the main point of the book or shall I say the climax because I keep herring about procedure for a mission but dpo not completely understand what the mission is what I do know is who the are going after and where the general area where this is taking place.